Security Advisories (12)
CVE-2018-14041 (2018-07-13)

In Bootstrap before 4.1.2, XSS is possible in the data-target property of scrollspy.

CVE-2018-14042 (2018-07-13)

In Bootstrap before 4.1.2, XSS is possible in the data-container property of tooltip.

CVE-2020-11022 (2020-04-29)

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.

CVE-2020-11023 (2020-04-29)

In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.

CVE-2019-11358 (2019-04-20)

jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.

CVE-2015-9251 (2018-01-18)

jQuery before 3.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks when a cross-domain Ajax request is performed without the dataType option, causing text/javascript responses to be executed.

CVE-2011-4969 (2013-03-08)

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jQuery before 1.6.3, when using location.hash to select elements, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted tag.

CVE-2012-6708 (2018-01-18)

jQuery before 1.9.0 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks. The jQuery(strInput) function does not differentiate selectors from HTML in a reliable fashion. In vulnerable versions, jQuery determined whether the input was HTML by looking for the '<' character anywhere in the string, giving attackers more flexibility when attempting to construct a malicious payload. In fixed versions, jQuery only deems the input to be HTML if it explicitly starts with the '<' character, limiting exploitability only to attackers who can control the beginning of a string, which is far less common.

CVE-2020-7656 (2020-05-19)

jquery prior to 1.9.0 allows Cross-site Scripting attacks via the load method. The load method fails to recognize and remove "<script>" HTML tags that contain a whitespace character, i.e: "</script >", which results in the enclosed script logic to be executed.

CVE-2019-5428

Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as _proto_, constructor and prototype. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on the Object.prototype are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.

CVE-2014-6071 (2018-01-16)

jQuery 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to use of the text method inside after.

CVE-2018-14040 (2018-07-13)

Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as _proto_, constructor and prototype. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on the Object.prototype are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.

NAME

UR::Object::Ghost - Abstract class for representing deleted objects not yet committed

SYNOPSIS

my $obj = Some::Class->get(1234);
$obj->some_method();

$obj->delete();   # $obj is now a UR::DeletedRef

$ghost = Some::Class::Ghost->get(1234);
$ghost->some_method;  # Works

DESCRIPTION

Ghost objects are a bookkeeping entity for tracking objects which have been loaded from an external data source, deleted within the application, and not yet committed. This implies that they still exist in the external data source. When the Context is committed, the existence of Ghost objects triggers commands to the external data sources to also delete the object(s). When objects are brought into the Context by querying a data source, they are compared against any ghosts that may already exist, and matching objects are not re-loaded or returned to the user from a call to get(). If the user wants to get Ghost objects, they must call get() explicitly on the Ghost class.

Each class in the system also has an associated Ghost class, the name of which is formed by tacking '::Ghost' to the name of the regular class. Ghost classes do not have ghosts themselves.

Instances of Ghosts are not instantiated with create() directly, they are created as a concequence of deleting a regular object instance. A Ghost can be turned back into a "live" object by re-creating it, or rolling back the transaction it was deleted in.

DEPRECATED

Applications will not, and should not, normally interact with Ghosts. The whole Ghost system is scheduled for elimination as we refactor the Context and software transaction framework.

SEE ALSO

UR::Object, UR::Object::Type